Public Servant Lifestyle

Thinktank report calls for root & branch reform to address "systemic failure" across the Civil Service.

Whitehall reorganisation and Ministerial reshuffles will not tackle the root of the Government’s recent problems: an unreformed Civil Service, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr) thinktank.

The Prime Minister acknowledged at PMQs recently that there had been “systemic failure, over a very long period” at the Home Office, while weaknesses in financial accounting in the NHS have flagged up long-standing problems with Civil Service accountability for delivery.

ippr’s year long research on Civil Service reform is based on interviews with 40 senior civil servants - including 10 Permanent Secretaries - and eight ministers, and is due to be published in July.

It will, says the ippr:

1: Show that recent failures in policy and administration are the result of an “accountability-deficit” in an unreformed civil service;

2: Argue that the central doctrine of ‘ministerial responsibility’ – which holds that ministers, and ministers alone, are accountable for everything that happens in their departments – is no longer relevant;

3: Quote ministers who feel increasingly frustrated with Civil Service performance and the way it ducks accountability, as well as civil servants who recognise the need for change.

ippr’s report will recommend that:

Civil servants should be accountable for their performance and ministers should be accountable for policy and resources. In so doing, the roles and responsibilities of minister and civil servants will be greatly clarified, making it clear who is responsible for what. This would make both ministers and civil servants more genuinely accountable

A Civil Service Commission (similar to the one in New Zealand) should be created to appoint Permanent Secretaries with review their performance with their Secretaries of State. The Commission would also set the strategic direction of the Civil Service, performance management of permanent secretaries, and other core capabilities like information technology and human resources across Whitehall. The Civil Service Commission would be empowered to remove poor performing permanent secretaries from post and to reward high performers

Parliamentary Select Committees should be strengthened and given the power to hold civil servants and ministers to account. The rules protecting civil servants should be abolished and committees should have the additional resources needed to scrutinise minister’s policy decisions

There should be a Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, as there is in Australia and New Zealand, which provides a strong centre but which is also open, transparent and accountable to Parliament

“Events in recent weeks have exposed significant weaknesses in the way Whitehall operates," says ippr Director Nick Pearce. "Rather than thinking that these can be resolved by moving ministers or restructuring departments, the Government needs to recognise that lasting change will only be achieved through Civil Service reform. With its focus downstream on public service reform, there has been no coherent reform strategy for Whitehall.

“The Civil Service lacks a culture of accountability which significantly undermines its ability to deliver. Recent problems at the Home Office and in the NHS highlight the importance of achieving a high performing Whitehall which can deliver policy reforms.

“We have a choice before us. If you hold ministers accountable for everything that happens at their department, including departmental operations, you will never get a high performing Civil Service. Without greater accountability, the only other option is to politicise the civil service. We believe that the way forward is to make the Civil Service accountable for what it does. This will drive up performance and rectify longstanding problems.”

ippr’s report on Civil Service reform - Rethinking Whitehall - by Guy Lodge, will be published in July.

More information available in Professional Groups