Complicating Dispute Resolution?
Last updated: 30/01/2007 - 12:49
Dispute resolution regulations seem to be making conflict management at work more complex and increase the burden on the tribunal system, according to a new survey.
Statutory dispute resolution procedures have made managing conflict at work more complex and failed to reduce the burden on the employment tribunal system according to a new survey, based on responses from 798 organisations, from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD).
The report Managing Conflict at Work, reveals conflict at work costs the average employer surveyed around 350 days of management time every year, as well as annual costs associated with employment tribunal claims of about £20,000, rising to over £210,000 for those employing 10,000 or more people.
Around one-third (29%) of employers believe disputes are less likely to be resolved informally following the introduction of the statutory dispute resolution procedures in October 2004, which introduced minimum three-step disciplinary and grievance procedures.
Statutory Procedures
The survey also reveals that many employers report increases in the number of formal disciplinary and grievance cases since the introduction of the statutory procedures. The statutory grievance procedure has caused considerable problems, with 42% of employers now more likely to resort to legal advice to ensure they don't fall foul of the regulations when dealing with staff complaints.
Ben Willmott, CIPD Employee Relations Adviser and author of the report, says: "The statutory dispute resolution procedures have led to a formalisation in how conflict is managed because employers are afraid of falling foul of the law. But an early intervention and informal resolution by managers is usually much more effective.
"The Department for Trade and Industry (DTI) should consider going back to the drawing board when they review the statutory procedures later this year. They have failed to reduce the burden on the employment tribunal system, adding to the complexity of tribunal hearings, as well as creating additional problems for employers by making managing conflict at work more bureaucratic.
"Employers must provide the relevant training for line manager and invest in mediation if they are serious about reducing the damage caused by conflict at work in terms of wasted management time and the high costs associated with tribunal claims. Workplace disputes also generate very significant hidden costs through their negative impact on employee morale and motivation, absence levels, staff retention and employer brand.
"While most organisations train managers to use disciplinary and grievance procedures too many are failing to recognise the value of mediation and training in dealing with conflict more generally."
Disciplinary & Grievance
The survey indicates the impact of statutory procedures - which came into force in October 2004 and set out a minimum 'three-step' disciplinary and grievance procedures as:
Sector Variations
Size of Organisation
Other survey findings include:
More information available in Professional Groups, Work Environment